Bengkel Penggunaan Aplikasi Telefon Pintar Dalam Komunikasi dan Pengurusan Pentadbiran di Pejabat

Bengkel Penggunaan Aplikasi Telefon Pintar (Messenger) dalam komunikasi dan pengurusan pentadbiran di pejabat 

Tarikh : 25 April 2017 (Selasa)
Masa :  8.30 pagi – 5.00 petang
Tempat : Pusat IT, PTAR 1
Peserta kursus : 30 orang
Penceramah : Tuan Haji Ahmad Faizar bin Jaafar 
Fasilitator  : En. Mohd Izwan Salim 

Objektif kursus ini diadakan bertujuan untuk :-

Untuk memberi kefahaman mendalam dan kemahiran mengenai aspek-aspek penggunaan applikasi telefon pintar - Messenger.
Untuk memberi pendedahan kepada penggunaan messenger dalam telefon pintar dengan komputer.
Untuk memudahkan kerja dalam komunikasi dan meningkatkan produktiviti pengurusan pentadbiran di pejabat.

http://library.uitm.edu.my/v4/index.php/en/component/jem/event/72-bengkel-penggunaan-aplikasi-telefon-pintar-messenger-dalam-komunikasi-dan-pengurusan-pentadbiran-di-pejabat

Penggunaan Aplikasi Telefon Pintar (Messenger) perlu pintar dari telefonnya

Tajuk-tajuk berita:

'Admin WhatsApp' boleh dipenjara -   BERITA HARIAN – 27/4/2017

“ADMIN KUMPULAN WHATSAPP” PERLU BENDUNG AHLI SEBAR FITNAH – BERITA HARIAN – 27/4/2017

Isu Penyebaran Maklumat atau Berita Palsu Melalui Aplikasi Pesanan

Menurut SKMM, perbualan pada aplikasi permesejan seperti WhatsApp, Telegram, WeChat, Viber dan sebagainya adalah bersifat persendirian. Siasatan hanya akan dilakukan sekiranya terdapat aduan mengenai apa yang dikongsikan atau disebarkan pada perbincangan kumpulan dalam aplikasi berkenaan.

Kesalahan ini tertakluk kepada kesalahan penyebaran maklumat palsu dibawah undang-undang Malaysia, termasuk seksyen 233 AKM 1998.

    Adalah menjadi kesalahan bagi seseorang untuk menggunakan perkhidmatan aplikasi seperti Whatsapp, untuk membuat dan memulakan penghantaran apa-apa komen, permintaan, cadangan atau komunikasi lain yang lucah, sumbang, palsu, mengancam atau jelik sifatnya dengan niat menyakitkan hati, menganiayai, mengugut atau mengganggu orang lain.

Secara tidak langsung, ini bermakna siapa sahaja yang bersalah menyebarkan maklumat palsu akan didakwa – dan bukannya khusus kepada pentadbir sesuatu kumpulan berkenaan sahaja.

Walaubagaimanapun, menurut SKMM, seseorang pentadbir akan dipertanggungjawabkan sekiranya:

• Apabila pentadbir sendiri membuat komen, permintaan, cadangan atau komunikasi lain yang lucah, sumbang, palsu, mengancam atau jelik sifatnya dengan niat menyakitkan hati, menganiayai, mengugut atau mengganggu orang lain, yang merupakan kesalahan di bawah seksyen 233 AKM 1998;
• Apabila pentadbir, walau pun dengan sendirinya tidak membuat komen tersebut, meminta komen sedemikian daripada yang lain;
• Apabila pentadbir membantu, melalui hasutan, mana-mana orang lain dalam kumpulan untuk membuat komen tersebut;
• Apabila pentadbir menghalang siasatan terhadap komen sedemikian oleh mana-mana agensi penguatkuasaan.

Seperti biasa SKMM menasihatkan pengguna menggunakan sebarang aplikasi permesejan atau media sosial secara berhemah, dan tidak menyebarkan sebarang maklumat palsu. Disamping itu, SKMM juga sedang mempertimbangkan keperluan menyediakan garis panduan untuk menggunakan aplikasi permesejan dan seumpama dengannya.



Sumber Rujukan: SKMM

#WhatsAppAdmin

#AdminWhatsApp


semak dahulu maklumat yang ingin dikongsikan di http://sebenarnya.my/  Tak pasti jangan kongsi

Portal SEBENARNYA.MY adalah sebuah pusat sehenti bagi rakyat Malaysia untuk menyemak dan melapor berita yang tidak ditentusahkan, yang diterima secara dalam talian melalui platform media sosial, perkhidmatan mesej segera, blog, laman sesawang, dan lain-lain.


Dengan adanya portal ini diharap gejala penularan berita palsu dalam talian yang boleh memberi kesan kepada masyarakat dan negara, dapat ditangani dengan berkesan.


Kepada #AdminWhatsApp group  ingatkanlah ahli2 group ye...hee...hee

Contoh Notis Disclaimer :

Saya dan lain-lain admin group ini tidak membenarkan atau  menyokong sebarang bentuk whatapps yang memaparkan informasi pornografi, tidak benar, fitnah, hasutan, penipuan dan paparan yang tidak sesuai selaras dan seperti yang ditetapkan dengan/oleh Akta Kommunikasi dan Multimedia 1998.

Segala whatapps dipaparkan oleh individu di dalam group ini adalah tanggungjawab setiap individu dalam group ini.

Read More

The five worst tech products of 2009 by TechRepublic : A ZDNet Tech Community

Despite the economic climate, 2009 was a great year for tech innovation. But, there were still some stinkers. See the five worst products of the year.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

While 2009 was a rocky year for the global economy, the technology industry continued its relentless march forward, especially in the areas of mobile Internet, smartphones, laptops, Web applications, and the virtualized data center. But, wherever there’s progress you’ll also find a boneyard of failed experiments, over-hyped products, and perennial under-achievers.

Here is my list of the five worst products in the tech industry in 2009. As you’ll see, the list is dominated by products in the mobile space but that’s only because mobile is where a lot of the innovation and investment is happening.

Let’s count them down.

5. Android 1.0
It may seem unfair to put Google’s Android operating system on this list because Android 2.0 - which powers the Verizon Droid that launched in Q4 - has developed into a competitive smartphone platform. However, before the launch of the Droid, the Android OS was high on hype and low on product development. The Android 1.0 devices, the T-Mobile G1 (below) and the myTouch 3G (which technically runs Android 1.5), were awful to use. The software was slow, clunky, and just generally felt unfinished. Android 2.0 is much better, but still faces the danger of forking the way other Linux and open source projects have.


4. The 7-inch netbook
During the first half of 2009, computer makers sold a lot of netbooks, powered mostly by a tough economy that drove budget-conscious consumers to these inexpensive systems. However, consumer complaints piled up about the first generation of netbooks, which featured scaled-down 7-inch LCDs and squished keyboards that were difficult to use (see ASUS Eee PC 701 below). Computer makers responded in the second half of 2009 by expanding the dimensions of most netbooks to feature 10-inch screens and more standard keyboards. In essence, the 7-inch netbook has been phased out, and thankfully so. Netbooks are now just slightly smaller and cheaper laptops. That was the point I was trying to make in my article Netbooks are dead. Long live the notebook.


3. Samsung Omnia
I tested and reviewed a lot of different smartphones in 2009. Some of the best ones I used were the iPhone 3GS, the BlackBerry Tour, the Palm Pre, and the Verizon Droid. The worst smartphone that I tested in 2009 was the Samsung Omnia. In fact, it’s the worst smartphone I’ve ever used. The Omnia was a Windows Mobile device with Samsung’s TouchWiz UI running on top of it. So, it had the out-dated software and speed limitations of Windows Mobile combined with the overcomplicated and unresponsive TouchWiz interface. Samsung recognized the folly of the Omnia and quickly replaced it with the Omnia 2 before the end of 2009. Still, if you want a Windows Mobile touchscreen I’d recommend the HTC TouchPro2 or HTC HD2.


2. AT&T 3G coverage
While iPhone sales exceeded expectations in 2009 and helped AT&T add a lot of new wireless customers, the reputation of AT&T’s network - it’s primary asset - took a huge hit in 2009, and rightfully so. With so many iPhone users in New York and San Francisco, the AT&T network buckled in those two metros under the strain of all the data traffic. The result was diminished speeds for 3G Internet service and lots of dropped calls. Since New York and San Francisco are where most of the tech press is located, AT&T really took it on the chin for its performance problems. Next came Verizon’s full frontal attack on AT&T’s network issues with its map ads (see below). Thus, it’s likely that 2009 will be remembered as the year that AT&T’s cobbled-together network and under-investment in 3G infrastructure were laid bare for the eyes of the world to see.



1. Google Wave
With its mission to replace email, or at least be what email could have been if it were invented in the 21st century, Google Wave launched on to the technology scene with grand ambitions in 2009. Announced at the Google I/O developer conference in the spring, Google Wave became a hot topic in the fall when Google’s policy of making the Beta available via invitation-only created a feeding frenzy on social networks for people clamoring for Google Wave invites. From the very beginning I said that this was one of those products that looks great in a presentation but makes no sense in the real world. After trying Google Wave when the product was released into the wild, my opinion hasn’t changed (and others such as Robert Scoble have come to the same conclusion). Google Wave is basically a super-chatty IM client, and a badly overhyped one at that. The only use I can see for this product is for geographically dispersed project teams collaborating and brainstorming on documents and product development ideas in real time. Email has nothing to fear. Google Wave will not be stealing its throne.



Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic. where he manages the editorial department, writes the blog Tech Sanity Check, and hosts the weekly video show Sanity Savers for IT Executives.



Previously, he worked as an IT Manager in the health care industry. You can find him on Twitter, LinkedIn and at JasonHiner.com. To see the gadgets and personal tech he uses, view his gdgt profile.

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=3430&tag=content;leftCol#

Read More